logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.02.15 2016나2008211
대여금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (i) The Plaintiff worked in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu Limited Company D (hereinafter “D”) and retired from his/her position on December 31, 2013.

Doll Defendant served as the director in charge of D's accounting division, and retired on April 10, 2014.

Consolidated D discontinued on March 2014, 2014.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant transferred money from October 22, 2007 to May 29, 2009, as indicated in the following table, to the account in the name of the Defendant (Seoul National Agricultural Cooperative). From May 25, 2012 to the account in the name of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff received money from the Defendant to the account in the name of the Plaintiff and received money from the Defendant until October 31, 2013 at the rate of 1% to 1.5% per month for each of the total amounts repaid or remaining.

The sum total of the amount repaid on the date of transaction is 50,00,000,000 50,000,000 or three times each month on October 22, 2007, and the interest rate is gradually lowered from 1.5% per month from the aggregate of the loans, and 1.2% per month from November 201, 201 and 1% per month from July 2012.

on November 6, 2007; 100,000,000 on January 6, 2007; 150,000,00 on January 3, 2008; 150,000,000 on August 15, 2008; 165,000,00 on September 15, 200, 100,000 on 15,000,000, 150,000, 150,000 on 15,00,00 on 15, 200,00 on 15,00,00 on 10,00,00 on 16,00,00 on 16,00,00 on 10,000 on 160,000,00 on 160,000 on 10,005;

C. The Defendant and D specification of transactions have remitted money remitted from the Plaintiff to D, and the Defendant has received an amount equivalent to approximately 2.5% to 3% of the cumulative total amount of remittance from D each month.

[Ground of recognition] without any dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 4, Eul evidence 5, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 23-3 through 8, 11 through 14, and 17 through 25, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff transferred money to the Defendant as described in the above 1-B.

arrow