1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

(a) The defendant shall be an administrative agency affiliated with Incheon Metropolitan City, which is established to implement matters concerning the development plan for the Incheon Free Economic Zone (Songdo District Office) and its surrounding area, and matters concerning the attraction of foreign investment within the free economic zone.

B. On August 19, 2016, the Defendant publicly announced that the development project operator of the PATRK52 Development Project “SYY” (hereinafter “instant project”) was recruited for the following:

1. Project outline name: An area subject to the development project of the Yongsansan PARK52: 615,940 square meters (it may be increased or decreased by 10 percent of the area) in Jung-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon;

2. Receipt of an application for participation in the public offering of major specified projects - The date of receipt: 09:00 to 18:00 project proposal assessment - Evaluation: September 28, 2016 - Notice of the result of selection: The public offering schedule on September 30, 2016 may be partially modified according to changes in circumstances.

3. Qualifications for participation and method of selection - qualifications for participation in free economic zones - qualifications for development project implementers under Article 8-3 of the Special Act on Designation and Management of Free Economic Zones and Article 6-

(i) In cases falling under Article 8-3 (1) 6 of the Act, a corporation shall be established within 30 days after the selection of persons eligible for preferential bargaining;

b. Selection Method - Evaluation Committee consisting of an evaluation [public disclosure of the highest braille (subject of preferential bargaining) after evaluation] - Evaluation (60%) of applicants (corporate agencies, etc.) and evaluation of project plans (40%). The detailed evaluation items and criteria shall be based on the Guidelines for Public Offering of Development Project Operators PARK52.

C. On September 23, 2016, when filing an application for participation in the instant project, the Plaintiff prepared a proposal explaining the status of the Plaintiff’s business (Article 3-1 and 3-2 of the A) and a proposal explaining the project plan (Article 3-2 of the A), respectively, and submitted it to the Defendant.

The Plaintiff’s corporate explanation “qualification requirements for the development project implementer” was submitted.