The judgment of the first instance court is modified as follows. A.

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 1,504,830,081 and KRW 1,450,712,860 among them.

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the remaining part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Expert E" shall be dismissed as "Expert E of the court of first instance."

Of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, the term “58,142.78 square meters” in the 4th page “58,142.78 square meters” is deemed as “58,142.78 square meters (=2,125.56 square meters) for the household that transferred the 56,017.22 square meters before March 30, 2018.”

Of the grounds of the judgment of the first instance, the fourth-party 5 is dismissed as follows.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including a branch number if there is a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings shall be deleted from all the notes of the judgment of the first instance.

The list of pages 5 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is as follows.

Even if the pre-use inspection was modified after the pre-use inspection, it did not constitute 70,230,960,773,417 131,205,782 121,839,610,610,040,50,162,189,834 369,606,4921,575,858,284 4,032,9339,634,130,637,637,637,347,475,4775,46207,485, 207, 36365, 1965, 207, 207, 367, 167, 394, 205, 257, 206, 365, 207, 367, 3964, 257, 2975

Of the reasons of the judgment of the first instance, the first instance court's "However, the first instance court's "However," is a fact-finding inquiry on August 10, 202 for the first instance court's appraiser E.