beta
Text
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including a claim extended and reduced in the trial, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the first instance court’s reasoning, except for the parts which are dismissed or added as stated in the second instance court’s decision, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The marks of conduct 15 to 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added or added to the following:
After an inspection on the use of divided defect repair costs for the 15th year of the 2 year following the 3th year of the 4th year of the 15th year of the 4th year of the 15th year of the 4th year of the 10th year of the 10th year of the 10th year, 876, 2214,068,068,045 17,437,980 10,414,571 2,539,639, 642, 453, 4533, 178, 178, 749, 636, 650, 370, 6313, 897, 415, 5364, 1965, 197, 1965, 297, 1965, 297, 25396, 197
In the first instance court's decision No. 4, "the results of appraisal by the first instance appraiser C" shall be added in front of "the purport of the entire pleadings" in the fourth part of the judgment.
Parts 8, 20, 9, and 14 of the decision of the first instance court are as follows.
F. Each household’s statutory living room type sprinking type sprinking type sprinking type 50 (former oil 50) The Plaintiff instructed a spingr spheringr spherr spherr spherr spherr spher spherd 3.2m in the relevant drawings. The Plaintiff asserted that the effective spheringr sphering type sphering type sphersphers installed in the apartment of this case is merely 2.3m in the event of a fire
The following circumstances, i.e., the entry of evidence No. 15, the result of the appraisal by the relevant appraiser C, the result of the appraisal request by the above appraiser C, the result of the fact inquiry by this court on the Korean Fire-Fighting Technology Society, which can be seen by comprehensively considering the whole purport of the arguments, i.e., the fire safety standards of sprinklers in apartment houses.