logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2020.11.12 2018나58892
하자보수금 등
Text

1. Defendant B among the judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded and reduced in this court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as stated in the following Paragraph (2). Thus, the reasoning of the judgment is cited pursuant

2. To replace the table of four pages of a part to be dried with the following table:

(A) If the court recognizes the defects arising from the “construction of household bath rooms, balcony liquid flood control alteration”, “ underground parking lots, PIT layer walls, floor waterproof thickness failure construction, etc.,” the items of the [Attachment 1] / [Attachment 1] / [Attachment 2, 4, and 5] / [Attachment 2] / [Attachment 2] - 402, 402, - - 2010 - - 601 - - 72,276,00 - - - - - - - - - - - 10 for the five years following the second five years following the pre-use inspection on the classification and pre-use inspection : 107,63,000 - - 42,400 - - - 402,402 - - - 402,402, - - 2014 - - - - - 20106.

(As to the assertion of both parties on whether to recognize defects, appropriate methods of remuneration, cost of remuneration, etc., reflects both the judgment of this court and the cost of repairing defects calculated by the appraiser by correcting errors on his/her own). On April 4, 10 to 12, the part indicated “based grounds for recognition” is as follows.

[Ground for Recognition] Facts without dispute, each entry of Gap 1 through 15 evidence (including each number), and appraiser E (hereinafter referred to as "appraisal")

As a result of the first instance court and the first instance court’s appraisal, the result of the commission of each appraiser by the first instance court to supplement the appraisal was as follows: (a) this court’s appraiser and the F Qu (hereinafter “F Qu”) as an incorporated appraiser.

The results of each fact-finding, pleading, and pleading.

arrow