200 Highest 1563 Night Building Larceny, thief

20 early 475 Application for a compensation order

Maap Defendant (alias) South 88.Resus, Company Board

Residential Ulsan-gu

In the case of the heading office (prosecution) and Kim Young-young (public trial)

Attorney Lee* (Korean National Assembly)

Gam Ownership (Gam Name)

Busan Jin-gu

August 28, 2020

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year. The application for compensation of this case shall be dismissed.

Criminal History Office

【Criminal Records】

On December 5, 2019, the Defendant is a person who was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor or two years of suspended sentence for larceny, etc. at the Ulsan District Court on December 5, 2019, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 13, 2019 and is currently in the grace period. [Criminal Facts]

1. Night-time theft of buildings;

가. 피고인은 2020. 1. 14. 04:20경 울산 중구에 있는 ○○아파트 201동 내부의 지하주차장에 침입하여, 그곳에 주차된 피해자 이피해(가명)의 ##@####호 싼타페 승용차의 시정되지 않은 차량문을 열고 들어가 보관함에 있던 피해자 소유인 10만 원권 수표 10장, 메모리 카드 1개를 가지고 나와 절취하였다.

나. 피고인은 2020. 2. 21. 02:58경 울산 울주군에 있는 ●●아파트 내부의 지하주차장에 침입하여, 그곳에 주차된 피해자 이주인(가명)의 ##@####호 칼로스 승용차의 시정되지 않은 차량문을 열고 들어가 보관함에 있던 피해자 소유인 현금 20만 원을 가지고 나와 절취하였다.

다. 피고인은 2020. 2. 23. 02:25경 울산 중구에 있는 ◎◎ 아파트 101동 내부의 지하주차장에 침입하여, 그곳에 주차된 피해자 이주차(가명)의 ##@####호 산타페 승용차의 시정되지 않은 차량문을 열고 들어가 보관함에 있던 피해자소유인 현금 20만 원, 17만 원 상당의 신세계 상품권, 신분증이 들어 있는 20만 원 상당의 MCM 지갑 1개를 가지고 나와 절취하였다.

라. 피고인은 2020.4.1. 02:40경 울산 중구에 있는 □□ 아파트 503동 내부의 지하주차장에 침입하여, 그곳에 주차된 피해자 지차주(가명)의 ##@####호 싼타페 승용차의 시정되지 않은 차량문을 열고 들어가 보관함에 있던 현금 38만 원, 운전면허증, 신용카드 4매가 들어 있는 구찌 지갑 1개, 메모리 카드 1개를 가지고 나와 절취하였다.

2. Larceny;

가. 피고인은 2020.1.17. 05:19경 울산 중구에 있는 ■■ 1차 아파트 108동 1-2호라인 앞 지상주차장에서, 그곳에 주차된 피해자 박소유(가명)의 ##@####호 쏘울 승용차의 시정되지 않은 차량문을 열고 들어가 가방 안에 있던 피해자 소유인 85만 원 상당의 롯데백화점 상품권을 가지고 나와 절취하였다.

나. 피고인은 2020. 2. 27. 02:35경 울산 중구에 있는 △△아파트 102동 지상 주차장에서, 그곳에 주차되어 있는 피해자 정해자(가명)의 ##@####호 맥스크루즈 승용차의 시정되지 않은 차량문을 열고 들어가 보관함에 있던 현금 200만 원, 100만 원 상당의 상품권, 메모리 카드 1개를 가지고 나와 절취하였다.

Summary of Evidence

(Omission)

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Article 330 of the Criminal Code(the nighttime Building thiefth, each underground parking lot in the holding) Article 330 of the Criminal Code provides that apartment buildings can be combined with the common area provided for public use to apartment residents, so it falls under the building of apartment under Article 330 of the Criminal Code), Article 329 of each Criminal Code(the thief

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2, and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Dismissal of an application for compensation order;

Article 32(1)3 and (2), and Article 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (the existence or scope of liability for damages is not clear)

1. The grounds for sentencing: Imprisonment with prison labor for one month to 15 years;

2. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) A primary crime;

[Determination of thief] 01. thief for general property (Type 4)

[Special Convicts] - Mitigation elements: Where a person intrudes into a place other than an indoor residential space.

【Recommendation Area and Scope of Recommendations】

Reduction Area, 8 months to 1 year and 6 months;

[General Aggravations] - Aggravations: the previous section that does not constitute repeated crimes;

(b) Second crime (eventime building thief; thief);

[Determination of thief] 01. thief for general property (Type 4)

[Special Convicts] - Mitigation elements: Where a person intrudes into a place other than an indoor residential space.

【Recommendation Area and Scope of Recommendations】

Reduction Area, 8 months to 1 year and 6 months;

[General Aggravations] - Aggravations: the same shall not apply to repeated crimes. The scope of recommendations according to the standards for handling multiple crimes: Imprisonment for 8 months to 2 years (the upper limit of crimes 1 + 1/2 of the upper limit of crimes 1/2)

3. Determination of sentence;

m. Unfavorable circumstances

Even though the defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case repeatedly within the short time. It is not much likely to cause damage.

4. favorable circumstances

The defendant is recognized as committing a crime and is against the victim, and the victim has agreed with the migrant and stuffing.

- When suspended sentence of a previous conviction becomes invalidated, taking into account the total period of imprisonment that the defendant should serve, and take into account the following circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, occupation, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments and records shall be determined as ordered.

The number of judges