(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.07.23 2015고단318

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.07.23 2015고단318

청소년보호법위반

Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. No person charged shall sell drugs harmful to juveniles, such as alcoholic beverages, to juveniles;

Nevertheless, at around 23:00 on October 24, 2014, the Defendant sold 7 beer with 3 times a week to E (18 years of age) and 3 persons working for E (18 years of age) who are juveniles in Pyeongtaek-si C and 3 persons working for it.

2. Determination:

A. The record reveals the following circumstances.

1. E is the birth of the Defendant’s friendly job offers F, and the Defendant was aware of such circumstances.

② Since May 2014, E began from May 1, 2014, in writing, according to the appearance of the Defendant at the instant head office, and the face is careful. It is difficult to believe that E’s statement that the Defendant did not examine the identification card once in the past is difficult.

(E) The past 91 year ago presented F’s identification card and was punished, but it cannot be ruled out the possibility that the Defendant was inside the 95-year identification card as the Defendant’s statement. ③ The Defendant under the control of the police, referred to as E as a guest when the police was prevented from entering the instant heading, and 95-year identification card. After that, the police officer was 95 years, E was 95 years of birth, and the Defendant was able to start 95 years of age. However, the Defendant was aware of the age of E prior to that 95 years of age, and believed E’s speech as the birth of her natives.

④ On the day of the instant case, E stated that the Defendant does not have any identification card of the remaining behaviors together with the Defendant, and on the contrary, the Defendant stated that he was aware of the age, except for E, that he was aware of the remaining remaining behaviors, and made an accurate statement during the two birth years during the first action. It is more reliable in the statement that the Defendant confirmed the identification card of the first action.

The prosecutor shall confirm the identification card of the police.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2017.03.31 2015노4635

-창원지방법원 2018.06.27 2018고정100

-의정부지방법원 2015.08.18 2015노1243

-서울남부지방법원 2014.01.16 2013노1750

-서울북부지방법원 2014.01.10 2013노1262