The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the Defendant’s grounds for appeal revealed that the Defendant’s identification card was examined and confirmed that the Defendant was not a juvenile, and sold alcoholic beverages.

At the time of the police's dispatch, the above day was sufficient time to reduce the forged identification card, and despite the absence of credibility of the statement D and E, the court below made a mistake to believe D and E's statement and to acknowledge the guilty of the facts charged of this case.

2. In light of the records of this case's decision on the grounds of appeal, the court below properly explained that ① the police officer called to the defendant's operation restaurant was inspected by presenting an adult identification card from D, E, and D, E, E, the defendant asserted that the defendant did not inspect his identification card and confirmed whether the police officer had an adult identification card, but the adult identification card was not found. ② G, G, 195, and H, 194, were presented their identification card to the police at the time, ② the police officer after the investigation of his identification card was presented, and the police officer stated that he was aware that he was aware that he was a student, and that the police officer after the investigation of his identification card was written, and ③ D, E, and E were sold to the minors without considering the fact that the defendant made a statement that the defendant's operation restaurant was so called "public drinking" and the defendant's identification card was prohibited.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of mistake is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.