A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than two months and by imprisonment for not less than eight months for the crimes of Articles 3 through 5 in the holding of the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On July 24, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for one year of imprisonment with prison labor due to a crime of re-election of electronic records, etc. at the Chuncheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 1, 2017.

[2] From April 2017 to October 2017, the Defendant: (a) sold a mobile phone with the trade name “C” in Busan Shipping Daegu; (b) from April 2017 to October 2017.

person is a person.

1. On June 15, 2017, the Defendant requested the victim’s “gallon No. 5” used by the victim D to change the name in the E future, the spouse of the victim, at the above mobile phone sales store around June 15, 2017, the Defendant made a request for change of the name. The victim’s “ballon No. 5” would be able to make the victim’s change of the name by changing the “gallon No. 2, a new mobile phone, to a gallon 2, and making a transfer of the radio station available through a transfer of the radio station.”

“A false statement,” however, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to settle the price of the horse instead of the price of the horse according to the promise.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and let the victim open (G) a new mobile phone in the name of his spouse E, thereby imposing KRW 297,000 on the victim as the price for the device. The third party F had the victim acquire property benefits equivalent to that amount.

2. On July 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) visited the victim D to ask about the combination of Internet and mobile phone telecommunications rates at the mobile phone sales store around July 11, 2017; and (b) made the victim’s “in order to combine the Internet with the mobile phone, this request must be made to the victim.”

“The Defendant, while making a false statement, prepared a new application for joining H. However, the Defendant’s application for joining that the Defendant had the victim prepare was a new application for joining the mobile phone, not for the combined arrangement, and the Defendant opened a mobile phone in the name of the victim by deceiving the victim.