(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2013.11.27 2013고단835

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2013.11.27 2013고단835

업무방해등

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. At around 01:00 on October 2, 2013, the Defendant, at the G convenience store for the operation of the Victim F, who is in the Changwon Magwon-si E, demanded tobacco to enter while under the influence of alcohol, and received two cigarette from the victim, and without any justifiable reason, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s desire to “nick, Chewing,” with the large sound, and without any justifiable reason, “I will interfere with the operation of the victim’s convenience store; (b) the victim’s demand from the victim to “I wish to take a bath, if I will do so, it will interfere with the operation of the victim’s convenience store” for about 10 minutes; and (c) the victim with a large sound, “I will see, e.g., fe., f., f., f., f., and f., f.,” and interfere with the victim’s business operation by force.

B. Performance of official duties, injury to the Defendant

The time, place, and the police box of the Msandong Police Station, which received a report and sent out, and the victim I expressed that “I (50 years of age) will ask the victim about the circumstances of the case, and I (the victim) “I will talk about why I will drank, Chewing franch, and bitch franch franch franch franch franch franch.” The victim was notified that I would be arrested by the victim due to obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and assaulted the victim by drinking, such as “Ilra, Chewing frans,” which “Ild the victim’s eye at one time.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers, and at the same time, he saw the victim a face-to-face in need of treatment for about two weeks.

2. Defendant B committed assault by Defendant B, at the time, at the place under Paragraph 1, on the following grounds: (a) the security guards belonging to the Msandong Police Station: (b) the Defendant arrested Defendant B, who was one of the Defendant, a flagrant offender, as a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; (c) flaps of the police officer; (d) flaps; (d) flaps, flaps, flaps; and (e) flaps of I’s flaps on his hand, and (e) interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2021.01.22 2020고합498

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2013.06.26 2013고단350

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.02.05 2019고단6014

-창원지방법원 2014.11.27 2014고합226

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.05.27 2013고단773