logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.10.12 2017고단1022
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 1022"

1. On January 20, 2017, the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, who committed the crime against the victim B, posted a letter to the effect that “on the part of the Defendant’s residence located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, 201 Dong 711, the Defendant would sell the Sille Pool hand hand on the bulletin board of the “China-si” country. On the 23th of the same month, if the Defendant reported the above letter and sent KRW 170,000 to the victim who had contacted, he would send the above visibility.

The term "" refers to the following.

However, the defendant did not intend to send the above visibility even if he received the above money from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant was transferred KRW 170,000 to the Saemaul Treasury account (E) in the name of the defendant from the injured party on the same day after the end of such false statement.

2. On March 3, 2017, the Defendant, at the same place as the above “1” paragraph, puts on the Internet to the effect that “I sell a 7 smartphone when galloning S7 smartphones” on the bulletin board of the “China” country,” and sending 273,000 won to the victim who has reported and contacted with the victim, the Defendant would send the said smartphones.

The term "" refers to the following.

However, even if the defendant receives the above money from the injured party, he did not intend to send the above smartphone.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had received 273,000 won from the injured party on the same day on the same day.

3. Crimes against victim F;

A. A. On March 9, 2017, the fraud Defendant calls for “G cafeteria” operated by the victimized person at the same place as the above “1” and pays the K cafeteria by credit card on the face of delivery.

“At the time of the completion of cooking,” “I wish to forward the food cost to the workplace after call again to the above workplace at the time of the completion of cooking,” and “I wish to forward the food cost to the workplace at the time of delivery.”

“.......”

However, even if the defendant received food, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the price normally, and he was walled with the company.

arrow