logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.10.25 2017고단1631
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On June 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Port Prison on November 29, 2016.

"2017 Highest 1631"

1. On January 31, 2017, the Defendant of the crime committed on or around January 31, 2017, posted a letter stating that he/she sold smartphones in the Defendant’s residence located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, and in the country, “sales of smartphones” and then first remitted money to the victim D who reported and contacted, he/she would send smartphones on his/her phone.

The term "" refers to the following.

However, even if the defendant receives the price for the goods from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell smartphones.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 43,000 won to the Daegu Bank Account (F) in the name of the defendant, who is the child of the defendant.

2. On February 1, 2017, the Defendant, on February 1, 2017, posted a letter stating that “sales of smartphones” at the Defendant’s residence as indicated in paragraph (1) at around February 1, 2017, would send smartphones to the victim G who reported and contacted, first transfer money to the victim G.

The term "" refers to the following.

However, even if the defendant receives the price for the goods from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell smartphones.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 40,000 won to the E account in the name of No. 1 on the same day from the victim.

3. On February 7, 2017, the Defendant, at around February 7, 2017, posted a notice to the Defendant’s residence as indicated in paragraph (1) around February 7, 2017, stating that “The Defendant sells smartphones” in the NA and then first remitted money to the Victim H who reported and contacted, the Defendant would send smartphones to the Defendant.

The term "" refers to the following.

However, even if the defendant receives the price for the goods from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell smartphones.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim and is under his control.

arrow