A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 16, 2016, the Defendant is a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on two or more occasions, such as a fine not exceeding three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, in the branch court of the Busan District Court in Busan District Court on March 16, 2016, and a request for a summary order of three million won for the same crime is filed with the Busan District Court on December 13, 2016.

On January 15, 2017, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license on a motor vehicle around 04:25, driving his/her own B observer car in the state of alcohol concentration of about 0.058% in a section of approximately 3km from the front side of the mutual influence restaurant located in the Seocho-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City to the 20, Seouk-dong, Busan Metropolitan City.

2. When the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, controlled D and D in the circumstances belonging to the Busan Northern Police Station C, which was under the influence of drinking driving at the location, the Defendant signed the report as if he was F, and signed the report on the circumstances of the driver at the State, which was presented by D and D, and sent the report as if he was duly formed, to D with the developments leading up to being aware of the forgery. After having the horse E enter F’s personal information into the transportation and police service system computer network through the police system, the Defendant signed the report on the results of regulating drinking driving and delivered the report as if he was duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising, forged a statement report on the situation of a driver in the name of F, and a statement about the result of crackdown on drinking driving, respectively, and exercised it respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (the previous decisions).