Plaintiff 1 and one other (Law Firm Blst, Attorneys Park Jin-jin, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

E. E.S. (S. Seocho Law Firm, Attorneys Park Sang-chul, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

on March 4, 2005

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2003Guhap31739 decided May 18, 2004

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The defendant's disposition of non-performance of measures against the plaintiffs on February 12, 2003 is revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Song Jin-jin (Presiding Judge)