logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.03.27 2018고단973
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 20, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year with prison labor for gambling, etc. at the Jeonju District Court and two years of suspension of execution for the same year.

2. 1. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

B, C was the principal offender of the “work loan” under the name of “work loan” by deceiving financial institutions, etc., who are victims who are not aware of it, by soliciting an unspecified large number of and unspecified persons, or manipulating credit card transaction performance, and was willing to serve as the nominal owner of the above work loan with the above B, etc., which the Defendant came to know through the introduction of D.

Around August 2015, the Defendant: (a) presented to B personal information data necessary for working loans, such as passbooks, resident registration certificates, etc. connected to B’s account in his/her name; (b) around November 5, 2015, B, C, etc. around that time, despite the fact that the Defendant had served in the said place of business, was employed as a disguised employment as if the Defendant had served in the said place of business; and (c) increased the credit rating of the Defendant by manipulating transaction performance using the Defendant’s personal information data, etc.

On May 12, 2016, along with the above B, C, etc., the Defendant presented a false certificate of employment, transaction record, etc. to the employee in the victim K Card, and applied for five million won in the card loan.

However, the defendant did not have served in the above J, and did not have an economic ability to obtain a loan equivalent to five million won, so even if he received a loan from the victim, he did not have an intent or ability to repay it.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the above B and C, by deceiving the employees of the victim as such, received the card theory equivalent to five million won from the victim, and made a work loan over 16 times in total from May 12, 2016 to May 25, 2016, as shown in the attached crime list.

arrow