The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant of mistake of facts is merely an interpretation conducted between K and D in relation to sexual traffic women G, which is related to D, due to the relationship with K in Japan.

There is no intention to arrange the occupation of sexual traffic, or to commit it.

B. The lower court’s sentence is heavy.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence examined in the lower court’s argument of mistake of facts, the following facts and circumstances are recognized.

The defendant's act of arranging sexual traffic, such as facts charged, can be recognized based on this.

1) G is the “H” at a sexual traffic business establishment located in the second floor and 203 of the Ma building located near the east of Japan from April 27, 2015 to June 16, 2015 (hereinafter “daily sexual traffic business establishment”).

A) At the time of working as a female in sexual traffic, he/she engaged in sexual intercourse with five customers who are less than a day in the N hotel room near it. 2) G reports the fact that he/she introduced Internet site "O" to work at a foreign sexual traffic store in the investigative agency and the court of the court below as to the circumstances that he/she works at the Japanese sexual traffic business establishment, and the contact was reached between the offline of "P" and the offline of "P" around the Gangnam Station and around April 17, 2015, he/she met with D. D, "I would like to report the ma of the Japanese sexual traffic business establishment's face" and "I would like to do so" and "I would like to introduce the defendant's mobile phone number in Gangnam-gu where I would like to get the defendant to work at the Cheongdong shop," and I would like to introduce the defendant's mobile phone number "I would like to work" in Seoul, and I would like to introduce the defendant's mobile phone number "I will work."