logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.01.10 2018고단2128
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 18:28 on September 14, 2017 to 20:34, the Defendant, at the waiting room of “D” 2 underground floors located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 12 female victims, such as the victim G (n, 21 years old) by installing Kamera, which caused sound management in the performance of “D” located in “B” located in “E University dance 2” located in Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, and by photographing 12 female victims, such as the victim G (n, 21 years old), with dynamics, in order to prepare for public performance, taken the body of other persons, who may cause sexual humiliation or sense of shame by using Kamera, against their will.

2.(a)

On November 25, 2017, between November 25, 2011:0 and 16:00, the Defendant was in the waiting room of the above “D” as follows.

In order for women performing 's performance' to take clothes as described in paragraph (1), it intrudes upon the structure managed by the performance team, such as victim H, etc.

B. The Defendant above A.

20 female victims, including the date, time, place, and camera set up in the port, have taken the body of another person, who may cause sexual humiliation or sense of shame, using the camera, by photographing 20 female victims, such as the victim H (n, age 29) in a video to prepare for public performance, and have taken the body of another person, who may cause sexual humiliation or sense of shame, against their will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. An investigation report (whether it is the same as a sunset);

1. Report on investigation (Evidence 3);

1. The National Institute of Scientific Investigation;

1. Video CD (Evidence Nos. 36-1);

1. Seizure records;

1. The list of seizure [the defendant is the fact that a camera was established with respect to the crime No. 2-B of the ruling, but did not take the photograph and denies the crime (Article 2-A of the ruling).

In other words, a crime that intrudes on a escape room for shooting is recognized.

However, according to the witness H’s testimony, the witness finds a camera.

arrow