(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.09.13 2017고정1

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.09.13 2017고정1

준사기등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October 10, 201 to imprisonment with prison labor for an attempt to commit any crime in the assistance in Ansan-do, the method of Suwon-do, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 7, 2014.

1. Quasi-Fraud;

A. Defendant (A) knew that the victim C was in a state of lack of decision-making ability and judgment due to depression between the Internet hosting site, and used it to open a mobile phone in the name of the victim so that the charge may be imposed on the victim, and the mobile phone that opened the mobile phone in the name of the victim is used to make the victim dispose of at will, and around July 10, 2014, the victim was sent KRW 400,000 to one mobile phone and 400,000,000 won from the market price through opening the mobile phone in the name of the victim.

B. On August 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had the victim obtain a loan from the lending company; (b) had the victim obtain a loan from the lending company; and (c) had the victim obtain a loan from the lending company and received a loan from the victim on the same day on the front side of the North Korean middle school located in 109 in Do-dong, Si, Gun-si, Si, Gun-si, in spite of the victim’s absence of the intent or ability to seek jobs, and (d) had the victim obtain a false statement to “to seek a job,” and then had the victim file an application for a loan from the lending company in the name of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by using the mental disorder of the victim.

2. On September 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) taken the victim’s PC room using the PC room; (b) borrowed the victim’s mobile phone from the victim with a mind to steal the victim’s mobile phone; and (c) borrowed the victim’s mobile phone; and (d) fleded the victim’s cell phone; and (c) stolen one cell phone at the market price which was not owned by the

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol concerning the examination of suspects of the public prosecutor with respect to F;

1. Details of requests for mobile phones;

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2016.01.27 2015고단3154

-창원지방법원 거창지원 2016.05.11 2016고단63

-전주지방법원 2019.06.05 2018고단2506

-부산지방법원 2016.11.10 2016고단5301

-청주지방법원 2016.07.01 2016고정252