(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2016.05.11 2016고단63

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2016.05.11 2016고단63

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 7, 2011, the Defendant: (a) committed fraud against the Victim Chang Chang-gu and Nonghyup AFF on February 7, 201; (b) prepared and submitted a written application for deposit in the account and an application for NH credit card transaction at the victim Chang-gu, Chang-gu, Chang-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and the North Korean branch; and (c) prepared and submitted the written application for deposit in the account and the written application for NH

From February 14, 201, the Defendant visited the NongHyup Agricultural Co., Ltd. on February 14, 2011, and followed by the Defendant as if the Defendant was C, and caused “the card requested” to the employee in charge.

“In doing so, by suggesting a passbook in the name of C, the staff in charge was accused and the staff was issued one credit card in the name of C from the injured party.

2. On February 7, 2011, the quasi-indicted 2: (a) the Defendant used the mobile phone opened in the name of the victim after opening the mobile phone in the name of the victim C; (b) even if the Defendant used it after opening the mobile phone in the name of the victim C, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the cost for the use of the mobile phone and the cost for the use of the mobile phone; (c) although the victim was unable to understand the legal and economic meaning of opening the mobile phone in the name of the victim, the Defendant used the mobile phone opened in the name of the victim with the intention of using the mobile phone in the name of the victim while failing to understand the legal and economic meaning of opening the mobile phone in the name of the victim; and (d) instead, the Defendant used the mobile phone opened in the name of the victim with the intention of using it in the name of the victim; and (d) did not pay the cost for the use of the mobile phone equivalent to KRW 726,000 from March 28, 2018.

The Defendant acquired property benefits by taking advantage of the victim’s mental and physical disorder.

3. Larceny.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2016.01.27 2015고단3154

-부산지방법원 2016.11.10 2016고단5301

-대구지방법원 2013.12.13 2013고단3976

-서울북부지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고정688

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.09.13 2017고정1