logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.09.14 2017고정364
한국마사회법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a stock farm in Jeju-si and D and produces horses, and E is a person who is registered as a marina in the head office of Min Society in Korea around December 23, 2000.

No racing shall be conducted by registering his/her horse in the name of marina without being registered as marina.

From around 2013, the Defendant registered the horses owned by the Defendant in the name of E, the horse owned by the Defendant, which had been in the management of other horses, and had the Defendant participate in racing without registering the horse around May 20, 2015, and registered the Defendant’s name “F” in the name of E:

G. From around 15:55, around 15:0 to February 27, 2016, around 6 times, the instant “F” racing conducted by registering the horse in the name of E, which is the Defendant, in the name of E, and running in the Mar society, from the time to February 13:25, 2016, from the time, at the Jeju Horse race track located in 2144, the said horse was running in the Korean Marae society.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Requests for an investigation related to a violation of the Korean marina Association Act;

1. A survey report;

1. Each finishing trade contract (F);

1. The current status of marina;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (verification of ownership relationship and racing details of this case H);

1. Article 51 subparagraph 6 of the Korean Marina Act and Article 11 (1) of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Consideration of the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the defendant, and that the number of weeks of withdrawal is six times, etc.

arrow