All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection KRW 43,780,000) is too heavy or too uneased (the Defendant).

2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (c) favorable circumstances such as the termination of an officetel’s lease contract that was used as a place for the business of arranging sexual traffic; (d) the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have considerable social harm by commercializing women’s sex and impairing sound sexual culture and good morals; and (e) the Defendant requires simple and strict punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments; (c) the Defendant has the history of being sentenced to a fine for the same type of crime; (d) the period of the instant crime was more than nine months; and (e) other unfavorable factors such as the Defendant’s age and happiness environment; and (e) the circumstances before and after the commission of the instant crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is adequate, too heavy or less.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided