All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (a fine of KRW 10,00,000, and confiscation and additional collection of KRW 5,960,000) is too heavy or too low (the Defendant).

2. In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (c) there was no history of punishment for the same type of crime; (d) favorable circumstances such as the fact that the period of the instant crime was not long; (b) the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have considerable social harm by commercializing women’s sex; and (c) the act of arranging sexual traffic is in need of a simple and severe punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture; and (d) the Defendant has been sentenced two times of committing the instant crime by committing the instant crime; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period; and (c) other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age and happiness environment; and (d) the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the lower court is adequate

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided