All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two years of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, probation, and additional collection) is too heavy or too low (the Defendant).

2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (c) favorable circumstances that the period of the instant crime was not long; (d) the acts of arranging sexual traffic do not have much social harm, such as the commercialization of women’s sex; (c) the acts of arranging sexual traffic do harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals; and (d) the need for a simple and serious punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime even if he was subject to a fine heavier punishment on three occasions due to the same type of crime; (c) the size of the instant sexual traffic establishments; (d) the Defendant’s age and happiness environment; and (e) the circumstances before and after the commission of the instant crime; and (e) the various conditions of sentencing specified in the records and pleadings, such as the records and arguments, are considered as adequate and too heavy

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided