logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.11.07 2019나53061
약정금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts used or added by the court of first instance as stated below 2. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The "B" of the 11th 3th 11th son of the decision made by the court below in writing or in addition is subject to the "A" amendment agreement.

The following shall be added to not more than 5 pages of the judgment:

“Although the Defendant has a duty to return unjust enrichment to the Defendant, the Plaintiff alleged that the Plaintiff’s negligence should be taken into account, as the Plaintiff was negligent in failing to deduct the field agent’s wages at the time of the settlement of the construction cost. However, the obligation to return is not reduced or exempted on the ground that the Plaintiff was negligent on the part of the party who received the return, just as the Plaintiff did not require the return obligor’

3. The decision of the first instance court on the conclusion is justifiable.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed for lack of reason.

arrow