1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is that the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff lent KRW 400,000 to the deceased as additional evidence submitted to the court of first instance is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff's assertion was given. The plaintiff's statement as to this case's evidence Nos. 15 to 17 is excluded. The court's reasoning for the judgment of first instance is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of first instance, except for the modification or addition of some contents as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to

2. Parts used or added;

(a) Each “witness” in Part 3 and Part 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be a “witness of the court of first instance”, and the “this Court” in Part 3 shall be deemed to be a “court of first instance”.

(b)in Part 3, part 9 of the judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added:

The plaintiff asserted that "(A) had a merm with a check number written on July 13, 201 to the deceased on July 13, 2011, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this.

(i) "";

(c)in the third page of the judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added: