A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the father of the victim D (math, 196) and the victim E (math, 198).

1. Crimes against victims D;

A. From around 207, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims thereof (indecent act by force in relation to relatives), and violated the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims thereof (in the case of minor rape, etc. under the age of 13), etc. (in the case of the Defendant’s residence located in Seo-gu, Gwangju (in the case of the Defendant, 10 years old at that time) put his hand into the clothes of the victim who was diving

Therefore, although the victim was not shouldered in diving, the defendant continued to have "doved the victim" and "doved the victim," and "doved the victim's chest."

Accordingly, the defendant, at the same time as a relative of relatives, committed indecent acts on women under the age of 13.

B. At around 19:00, the Defendant violated the Child Welfare Act: (a) around 19:00, the Defendant placed the victim’s chests into the victim’s room located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju (the 17 years old at that time) who was diving.

Therefore, even though the victim's knife said that the victim would not be the defendant, the defendant would end the knife, and the knife would make the knife of the victim's knife by making the knife with the knife of the victim's knife, let the knife of the victim's knife, cut off the victim's knife with the knife, cut off the victim's knife with the defendant's knife, cut the victim's knife with the victim's knife, and then put

Accordingly, the Defendant committed abusive acts such as sexual harassment and sexual assault that cause a sense of sexual shame to children.

2. The specific name of the crime of violation of the Child Welfare Act against victims E was first implemented on September 29, 2014 in accordance with the Supreme Prosecutors' Office Rules No. 737, and was indicated only as "child welfare violation."

The victim E.