logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.01.23 2019가단500647
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs (Counterclaim Defendant)'s main claim and the defendants' counterclaim are dismissed, respectively.

2...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Plaintiff A and Defendant D are the F Middle School in 2018 (hereinafter “instant middle school”).

(2) Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and Defendant E is the mother of Defendant D.

B. On August 31, 2018, the instant middle school, including G, took place a case where nine students of the instant middle school, such as G, were to take part in the group, to seek whether they were her back to the lower part of the case. 2) The students who exercised school violence against H were given her fluencing her back from Defendant D to the part of the school.

Around that time, there was a dispute between H and the Defendants as to whether Defendant D spreads false facts that H did not go through the rear gate, and whether Defendant D spreads false facts that H followed.

3) On September 14, 2018, Defendant E expressed that “A, while having gone through the process of confirming school violence, she would have prevented the relationship between D and H, and she was terminated the relationship between D from August 2018.” On October 25, 2018, the mother of H would like to submit a recording of the instant middle school with Defendant E in consultation with the principal of the instant middle school, and would have the same contents as the said 3). The principal of the student department stated that “A would inevitably undergo a fact-finding procedure against the Plaintiff,” and that the mother of H would not present the evidence of Defendant E.I.D to Defendant E. 28, 2018.

arrow