logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.01.23 2019가단506461
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) D and E jointly share the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) with KRW 3,729,700, Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) B and C, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Plaintiff A and Defendant D are the G Middle School in 2018 (hereinafter “instant middle school”).

(2) Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, Defendant E is the mother of Defendant D, Defendant F is the outside money of Defendant D.

B. On August 31, 2018, the instant middle school, including H, took place a case in which nine students of the instant middle school, including H, were fluencing the Plaintiff into a group, leading the Plaintiff to find out whether the Plaintiff was a rear flucing fact. 2) The students who exercised the school violence against the Plaintiff were flucing in the school of the Plaintiff from Defendant D that the Plaintiff was not flucing with their rear flucing.

3) Around September 21, 2018, Defendant D told Defendant E that “A makes school life difficult. A’s other patriotic tests will take place. It means that A will take a desire for, and go to do so.” (4) around September 21, 2018, Defendant E made a phone call to the Plaintiff and asked Defendant D to determine whether the words are the same as that of the above 3). (5) On October 19, 2018, Defendant F sought from the instant middle school and talked with the instant middle school in the third year, Defendant F made a statement to Defendant F, “D will be a victim. I will be able to take a desire for, and will be not.”

6) On October 25, 2018, the Plaintiffs reported school violence in relation to the bullying of H et al. and language violence in the instant middle school under the said Section 1.

In addition, on September 7, 2018, the Plaintiffs asserted that Defendant E made a telephone call to the Plaintiff and asked to the horses that the Plaintiff did not Plaintiff, and that Defendant F disseminated any false fact by finding it at the school on October 19, 2018, and that Defendant E and F reported as school violence cases even with respect to Defendant E and F’s activities.

7. Meanwhile, the Plaintiffs heard the phrase “I would have ever died” from Defendant D to the phrase “I would have the Plaintiff A and Defendant E, who had been on September 7, 2018.”

arrow