The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Sexual assault, 40 hours against the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant alleged misconception of facts or misapprehension of legal principles merely asked the victim that “the victim is aware of the murder case” after committing an indecent act, but did not mention the murder case which was permissible prior to the indecent act by the victim, and did not threaten the victim. Although the injury suffered by the victim did not constitute an indecent act by the Defendant and a causal relation with the indecent act by the Defendant, or an injury in the crime of bodily injury by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act by compulsion, the lower court guilty

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years and six months of imprisonment) on the assertion of unfair sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Prior to the judgment on the grounds of appeal ex officio, the prosecutor examined the part of the facts charged as to the injury caused by indecent act by compulsion at the trial of the case, which read as the "hacker," and "hacker hacker hacker hacker hacker hacker hacker hacker," which read as the "hacker hacker hacker hacker hacker," the victim hacks the victim behind the parking lot pole, and hacker hacks the victim's chest, hacker hacker, and hacker hacker, etc., which read as the result of the indecent act for about 20 minutes of the victim's chest, which read as the "hacker hacker hacker hacker, packer hacker, etc.," which read as the "hacker hacker hacker hacker hacker, etc., which caused the victim's losses."