A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 4, 2014, the Defendant driven a CBelgium car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.128% in the section of about 200 meters from the 30-lane to the cryp road located in the 8-lane 31 of the same Gu without obtaining a driver’s license in around 04:10 on September 4, 2014.

2. On September 4, 2014, at the E District Office located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (a) stated “F” in the driver’s column of the Daegu-dong Police Station E District Unit G working assistant for the Daegu-dong Police Station, stating that F is F, with a view to exercising as if F had driven a car of C, at the E District Office located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, as the Defendant said F; and (b) written F, in the driver’s column of the report on detection of drivers and the report on the de facto statement of the State-employed

Accordingly, the Defendant forged each copy of F’s report on detection of a master driver in F’s name and the circumstantial statement report on a master driver’s identity, which is a private document regarding the certification of facts.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, issued to the said slope G, who was unaware of the forgery of the said investigation document, the written report on the prime driver’s license and the written report on the actual condition of the prime driver’s license, as if the written report was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. The circumstantial statements of each drinking driver, and the report on detection of each drinking driver;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses;

1. An investigation report (to attach a closure report after the following closure);

1. On-the-spot, the Defendant asserts to the effect that the vehicle was locked only in a state of drinking and that the Defendant did not drive the vehicle. However, in full view of the location where a proxy engineer recognized by each of the above evidence stopped the Defendant’s vehicle and the location where the Defendant was found by the control police officer, the proxy engineer H stops the vehicle after leaving the vehicle.