beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As to KRW 37,60,760 and KRW 37,320,910 among Defendant A, Defendant A shall be from October 12, 201 to November 30, 2012.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant B and C wished to obtain a loan on or around August 2009, but the financial institution is difficult to obtain a loan by normal means, and conspired to divide the loan from the financial institution with false employment-related documents and false housing lease-related documents, and then, in the office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the fact was in the office located in Songpa-gu G, Songpa-gu, Seoul. Although Defendant A had not worked as an employee in the “H” operated by Defendant D, Defendant A prepared a false certificate of employment in the name of “H representative I” as an employee of
B. Meanwhile, Defendant E, upon receipt of a request from Defendant B and C to introduce a person who will lend the name of the lessor under the housing lease contract to be concluded with the lessee on the condition of receiving the consideration from Defendant B and C, proposed that Defendant F lend the lessor’s name. Defendant B and C consented thereto. Defendant B and C, along with Defendant A, entered into a false lease agreement with Defendant F, stating the name of the lessor under the name of the lessor at the office of K real estate located in the Seoul Southernbuk-gu, Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, with the name of the lessor.
C. After that, around August 12, 2009, Defendant B and C moved Defendant A to the broad distance point of the victim bank located in 4 U.S., and Defendant A applied for a loan of 40 million won to employees in charge of loaning the above bank's name and in this place, Defendant B and C applied for a loan of 40 million won to employees in charge of loaning the above bank's name. Although there was no intention to implement the loan in accordance with the terms of the lease contract, the fact was actually used as the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the house, and as if Defendant B and C were employees on the certificate of employment, submitted the falsely prepared lease contract and the certificate of employment falsely prepared by Defendant B and C.
The Korean bank shall be an entrusted institution for the housing finance credit guarantee business of the plaintiff.