logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.28 2015가단5064752
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant A, B, and C jointly share KRW 37,897,580 with respect to the Plaintiff and the year from July 27, 2012 to January 8, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. around July 201, Defendant B received a proposal from Defendant D to grant the lessor the purchase price of a housing lease agreement to be used for the purpose of the employee deposit loan loan from “G real estate” located in the Seoul Northern-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is operated by Defendant D, and “H”, and accepted the proposal.

B. Upon receiving a proposal from Defendant B to offer a lessor of a housing lease agreement to be used for the purpose of a loan for workers’ entire loan, Defendant C consented to the offer and offered that Defendant A lend the lessor’s name as above. Defendant A provided a house under the name of Defendant E in the fraudulent name of that woman to whom the right to lease was delegated by the consent.

C. Around July 201, “H” was recruited to receive Nonparty I’s full-time loan from Nonparty I or to divide them into two types, and the fact was, even though he did not have worked as an employee of the Dispute Settlement Council, a false certificate of employment in the name of the “K representative of the Dispute Settlement Council”, which was entered into by the employee “H,” and a false lease agreement was entered into between Defendant B and the “B, 65 million won, E, lessee, and I,” with respect to the housing in the name of Defendant E for whom he was delegated the right to lease from the said G real estate office.

“H” around July 20, 201, around 201, when I moved I into the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu New Bank, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and I applied for a loan of 45,550,000 won to an employee in charge of loan, and even though he did not intend to implement the loan contract and had worked for the said enterprise, the above employee submitted documents, such as the lease contract and the certificate of employment, which was falsely prepared as if he used the loan as a deposit for a house.

E. On July 20, 201, the employees of the new bank in charge of the Plaintiff’s business entrusted by the public offering in the above order are I and I.

arrow