beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As to KRW 36,645,549 and KRW 31,292,647 among them, Defendant A shall have from July 4, 2012 to March 25, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On April 201, Defendant C and D conspired to have Defendant A, who is difficult to borrow a financial institution by normal means as a patrolman, with the relevant documents related to his/her false employment and false documents related to housing lease, to be divided by borrowing employee housing lease funds.
B. On April 201, Defendant B received a proposal from Defendant C to grant compensation if he/she lent the name of the inside director of H, which is necessary for creating documents related to his/her employment, such as a certificate of employment to be submitted at the time of lending employee house transfer fund, from Defendant C.
C. On April 201, 201, Defendant C made documents related to his/her employment, such as a certificate of employment, which was written by Defendant A as an employee of the said company, even though he/she had not been employed as an employee of the said company, at the H office located in Hacheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.
Defendant E, upon receiving a proposal from Defendant C to introduce a person who will act as a lessor of a false house leasing contract, proposed that Defendant E would give a consideration to the lessor, and then the lessor would be able to do so. On April 201, Defendant E proposed that Defendant F would give a consideration to the lessor of a false house leasing contract.
E. Defendant F consented to the above proposal by Defendant E, and required Defendant G to prepare a false lease agreement under the name of Defendant G, the husband, and Defendant C prepared a false lease agreement with the K Licensed Real Estate Agent's Office located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul (hereinafter "the lease agreement of this case").
F. On April 22, 2011, Defendant A applied for a loan of KRW 56 million to an employee in charge of loans from the Korean Bank (hereinafter “Korea Bank”) on a deposit basis. The fact is that Defendant A, despite the absence of an intention to rent a house as specified in the above deposit agreement and having worked in H, is having been working in the said company and actually having been working in the said company.