logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.12.12 2014고단3539
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a marina shop with the trade name of "D", three smuggling rooms for commercial sex acts, and three waiting rooms for female employees, etc., and Defendant B works as an employee of the above business establishment, and received the price of commercial sex acts from customers, and provided guidance to customers to take place of commercial sex acts.

On June 24, 2014, around 21:00, the Defendants arranged female employees to engage in commercial sex acts by receiving KRW 100,000 from customers and allowing female employees to engage in sexual intercourse with the said customers, etc. from April 24, 2014 to June 21:00, the Defendants received KRW 100,00 from many unspecified customers and arranged female employees to engage in commercial sex acts.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Defendant B’s statement in the first trial record;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against the defendant A;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A real estate lease contract and a report on business closure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transactions of passbooks;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Selection of Punishment for Crimes and Imprisonment with labor;

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant 2) Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The fact that he appears to have led the instant crime, the fact that he did not attend the court for a long time, nine previous years, and the fact that he did not have the previous crime, and the age, character and conduct of the Defendant, circumstances after the crime, etc.

2. Defendant B: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that he participated in the crime of this case as an employee, that the previous department was two times the previous department, that he was the defendant's age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc.

arrow