logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 12. 24. 선고 2015두51361 판결
(심리불속행) 명의신탁의 목적에 조세회피목적이 없었다고 볼 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2014-Nu-57234 (20 August 20, 2015)

Title

(Incompetence of Trial) It cannot be deemed that there was no purpose of tax avoidance for the purpose of title trust.

Summary

(In the original instance) It is impossible to apply the proviso of the above provision to the extent that the purpose of title trust is not included in the purpose of tax avoidance, and thus, it is deemed that there was an intention of tax avoidance as well as the main purpose of other provisions.

Related statutes

Article 41-2 (1) of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2015Du51361 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

MaS

Defendant-Appellee

YThe director of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu57234 Decided August 20, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by appellant are not included in the grounds of appeal under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow