logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.03 2016누51605
추가상이처 인정거부처분 취소청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the addition or dismissal of some contents, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

In the second page No. 11 of the same part, “Around June 4, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal seeking revocation of the instant disposition with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on September 15, 2015.”

Part 2, "No. 3 of the A" in Part 12 shall be understood as "No. 3 and No. 7 of the A".

Part 3, 10, “No. 10” is added to “(the same shall apply even if each description of Gap evidence 8-1 to 3 additionally submitted in the trial is added).”

The decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow