logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.03.16 2016누70439
개발부담금부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of some contents, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the

The portion used or added shall be 7,320,40 square meters "7,320,40 square meters" and "7,320,40 square meters" under the top-class figure on the third side.

Part 6, "90,000,000" shall be deemed to be "700,000,000".

Part 6, "373,400,000" shall be deemed to be "3,734,00,000".

Part 8, Paragraph 9, “Agreement” is added to “Article 4 and Article 6 of the Evidence A (Real Estate Sales Contract)” (Article 4 and Article 6) by means of cancelling a contract where it is not possible to obtain permission for development and land transaction in connection with permission for development and permission for land transaction without specifying the time of payment of intermediate payment or remainder at the time of a contract for sale.”

Part 8, the price of the 10th page is high as “the amount claimed as the price”.

Part 10, Paragraph 1, “No.” is added to “A” [the same shall apply to the case where the Plaintiff’s additional statement of No. 25 through No. 28 (including a Serial number) submitted by the appellate court is added.”

The decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow