logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2019.07.24 2019누649
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding or changing some contents as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

On the second and second sides of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall be added:

D. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal on January 25, 2019. However, the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the said claim on March 12, 2019. The judgment of the court of first instance changed the “Evidence 1, 3, and 11” of the first instance judgment to “Evidence 1, 3, and 11.”

In the fourth sentence of the first instance judgment, “No. 6” is added to “(the same shall apply even if the Plaintiff bears each description of the evidence No. 9, 10, which was additionally submitted to this court).”

In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow