The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the company members of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”).

On November 29, 2019, around 12:05, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire at the rest room in the instant company’s office, on the ground that there are about 10 persons, such as the victim D (n, 43 years of age), E, F, G, and H, and that the victim did not desire the Defendant even though he did not wish to do so, and that he did not wish to do so, “this year, year, and year which would be the result of the occurrence of the disability.” The Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to grow at a large voice anywhere in the year where the disabled was created. Chewing and year that would be the result of the occurrence of the disability.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. 피고인은 2019. 11. 29. 12:20경 이 사건 회사 사무실 내에서 피해자가 위 1항과 같이 욕을 한 것에 대해 항의한다는 이유로 I, J, K, L 등 약 10명이 있는 자리에서 피해자를 향하여 “쌍판데기에 화장이나 하고 다녀. 이 장애인 같이 생긴년, 이 씨발년아, 빨리 회사에서 퇴사나 해라. 나가라 별 좆같은 년 다 보겠네. 너 밤길 조심해라. 씹년, 씨발년아 똘끼 있어 보인다. 나대지 마라, 똘끼 있다. 이년이 썅년이”라고 큰소리로 욕하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.

C. On October 12, 2020, after the institution of public prosecution, the victim submitted a written application not to punish.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;