Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

On November 6, 2017, at the “D” restaurant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, around 2017. 20:10, the Defendant argued that “A victim E (36 years) who was suffering conflict due to the Defendant’s failure to pay the introduction fees to introduce customers on the main points at which the Defendant works, was in dispute.” On the other hand, the Defendant: (a) took a dangerous object, and threatening the victim as if he had been aware of the dangerous object, and (b) took a threat of the victim, and then, (c) was in a mountain where he was able to kill the victim, and (d) he tried to kill the victim, and (d) took a quid pro quo.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Articles 283(1) and 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines concerning the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. Facts charged;

A. On November 6, 2017, at around 20:10, the Defendant used the victim E (36 years of age) to take the victim E (36) in a cafeteria located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as the alley by the restaurant, and used the victim’s desire to see: (a) the victim E (36 years of age); (b) the victim’s walked to see: (c) the victim’s eye; (d) the victim’s head was 3:4 times due to his/her finger; and (e) the victim’s head was cleeped and sucked on several occasions; and (e) the victim’s left face and suck part was 2 to 3 times in drinking.

B. On November 6, 2017, the Defendant knew that he reported the Defendant’s assault, etc. to the police at an infinite place on November 6, 2017, the Defendant was aware of the fact that he reported the Defendant’s assault, etc. to the police. However, whether the Defendant made the victim’s cell phone call to the victim and reported the victim’s “confinite,” and whether he made the victim’s cell phone report on it

For this reason, we illegally see around it.