All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인은 2015. 12. 13. 22:00 경 시흥시 B에 있는 피고인의 주거지에서 임대인인 피해자 C이 피고인의 처와 다퉜다는 사실을 알고 화가 나 피해자에게 전화하여 " 너 죽이고 내가 죽을게!

n her husband's her husband's her husband's her husband's her husband.

In a week, this weather is cut down, and this weather was threatened. "The victim was threatened."

2. The Defendant: (a) the victim C, after telephone call at the above date and place, was found to be the Defendant’s residence; and (b) the victim C was killed.

A dead person, a person to whom he or she has died.

"The victim threatened the victim".

3. Defendant 1 met the victim at the above date, time, and place, and killed the victim by reporting her knife to the victim C by reporting her knife to his knife, her knife to his knife at his knife, and his knife with his knife when she died.

"In the way of sending the Kakao Stockholm messages, the victim was threatened."

4. The Defendant, at around 17:00 on January 25, 2016, found the victim C to be unable to reach a good condition.

Madden, to his or her father and son;

C. At all times, the victim was threatened by sending the text message “.....”

2. Determination and conclusion

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act;

B. After the prosecution of the instant case, the victim’s non-existence of punishment is indicated.

(c) Dismissal of public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;