logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.13 2016구합654
불합격처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 20, 2015, the Chairperson of the Personnel Committee of Incheon Metropolitan City publicly announced an implementation plan for the examination for appointment of local public officials on March 20, 2015, and the details of class 9 of class 9 of class 9 of class 9 of class 9

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant appointment examination”) . 3. The method of examination and method of determining successful applicants for the appointment examination concerning class 9 local public officials driving service in Incheon Metropolitan City B;

(a) The first and second examinations of the examination method: the third examination of multiple-choice written examinations: Documents screening and interview;

(b) Method of deciding successful applicants (the 12th joint examination) - Open competitive appointment examination: An examination to determine successful applicants (the third joint examination) by taking into account the results of the examination and the number of successful applicants for the third examination, etc. for the persons within 150% of the number of persons to be selected in order of the total score points of all subjects from among persons with at least 40% peculiar points of each subject - The decision to refuse to pass the examination shall be deemed to be "qualified applicants", and the applicants with the grade of "ordinary" shall be deemed to be "qualified applicants" until they reach the number of persons to be selected, including the number of applicants with the grade of "Excellent" in order of the highest written applicants, and the applicants with the grade of "unless they reach the number of persons to be selected" shall be deemed to be successful, and the applicants with the grade of "unable" shall be deemed to have failed to pass the examination.

4. Qualifications for application;

(a) Examination age - The second appointment examination: the age of eighteen or more (the person born before December 31, 1997);

(b) qualifications and academic background (restricted to career) - Operation of Class 9 on the second appointment examination: Functional categories that require the first-class driver's license (type) may be applied only by a person who holds the relevant qualification (license).

11. Guidance on the modification of examination systems;

(a) Guidance on conducting interviews by the classification of Sis/Guns/Gus and by the appointment institution (Si/Gun/Gu);

arrow