logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.08.24 2017노492
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and the defendant corporation AH for a fine of KRW 15 million.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant AH Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) on the premise facts

(3) In addition to the manufacture of private houses, which are processed food of kind-friendly environment-friendly livestock products, after receiving the orders of R, AF, and AE, the Defendant Company’s name also manufactures general processed livestock products (private sugar, galone, etc.) under the name of the Defendant Company.

Defendant

All the boness used in the processed food of general livestock products manufactured under the name of the company shall not remain in the bones, as well as in the bones, different from those of other parts of the cattle.

If antibiotics are detected in cattle, it is prohibited from being used for food.

In addition, in the case of bones, there is no cost difference between the bones of cattle certified as non-biotic drugs and the bones of cattle not certified as non-biotic drugs.

In addition, in order to make sure that the balone's balone's balone's balone's balone's balone's balone's balone's one's balone's balone's balone's balone's one's balone's balone's balone's balone's one's balone's balone's balone's balone's balone's balone's balone's balone's balone's balone

Along with the burden of 2 hours, 7 hours' hacks, and 2 hours' hacks, hacks are not the bones of cattle to be discarded, but the bones of cattle that can be potableed by being manufactured as hacks.

In addition, there is no difference between the cost of Maglas and Maglass not certified as one-free antibiotics, and the defendant company is not required to put the Maglass of this case into the Maglass instead of the Maglass not certified as non-biotics in the manufacture of Maglass. Thus, there is no benefit that the defendant company obtained by inserting the Maglass of this case.

B. Legal principles are applied to the products manufactured by the Defendants.

arrow