beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
Defendant
If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a de facto representative of a stock company B, which runs a livestock processing business ( meat processing business).
No person shall place an advertisement of any non-certified product as a certified product or an advertisement in a manner that misleads any person to believe the product is a certified product or in a manner different from the certified product.
Nevertheless, the Defendant stated in the indictment on August 1, 2017 as “ around May 30, 2017,” but it is apparent that the above date is the light of evidence records (17 pages of the suspect interrogation protocol).
It does not impede the defendant's exercise of defense right;
Since it is judged, it is corrected ex officio without the amendment procedure of indictment.
From now to now, the above company in the Namyang-gun C had been certified as a person handling anti-biotics livestock products free of anti-biotics for pigs (fish) supplied swine (franish) from E business team F, E, which is located in D, and advertised the name of the product processed as a spawd paper by mixing the spath and spathy spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic s
2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. committed the act of violating the above 1. Paragraph (1) in relation to the Defendant’s business at the date and at the place specified in the above 1.1.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant A’s legal statement
1. Business registration certificate and business permission;
1. A certificate;
1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes of a report on internal investigation and an accompanying photograph;
1. Article 60 of the Act on the Promotion of Environment-Friendly Agriculture and Fishing Business, the Management of and Support for Organic Food, Etc., and Article 30 subparagraph 8 of the Act on the Management of and Support for Organic Food, Etc., as well as Article 60 of the Act on the Punishment, etc., applicable to the indictment, shall be corrected ex officio, because it is obvious that the indictment is a clerical error due to mistake.
Defendant
Co., Ltd.