beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual 5% from December 12, 2015 to December 15, 2016, and the following.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
The defendant worked as the head of the design team from April 2015 to January 2016 from Da in 205, the defendant was the assistant staff of the defendant as the above company design team.
At around 18:20 on November 13, 2015, the Defendant stopped on the side side of the road, stating that “I am difficult to see, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”
The Defendant committed an indecent act by reporting the Plaintiff’s sucking and leakage of a chief chair, and on his own hand, rhumbucks inside the Plaintiff’s buckbucks, and the Plaintiff saw the Plaintiff’s body towards his hand and knife the Plaintiff’s chest by cutting the Plaintiff’s chest into the Plaintiff’s upper part.
Around 18:00 on November 19, 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act, such as: (a) at D’s sugar room; (b) one’s own following the Plaintiff’s left hand; (c) one’s finger by inserting it into the Plaintiff’s name; and (d) the other kiscing the chest; and (c) kiscing the Plaintiff’s face.
At around 08:30 on December 12, 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act, such as the Plaintiff’s defect in questioning about the Plaintiff’s business affairs, and the Plaintiff’s behind the Plaintiff, who was seated in the front of the computer, she seems to have spared the Plaintiff, she operated the string of the computer with his hand, and she included his left hand into the Plaintiff’s inside the Plaintiff’s name, and she committed an indecent act.
The Defendant was indicted for the indecent act by compulsion by force of this Court No. 2016 Highest 2429, and was sentenced to a conviction of 8 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended execution, 2 years of education attendance order, and 80 hours of community service order on August 4, 2016 by the above court.
The above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
[Grounds for recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings is clear in light of the empirical rule that the defendant suffered mental pain by compulsion of the plaintiff several times, and thus, the defendant shall pay consolation money to the plaintiff.