A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Criminal facts

"2016 Highest 6470" Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "D").

The above company is the representative director of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Etel on February 3, 2010, F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”).

In addition, the right of retention is claimed for the above officetels on the ground that the existing contractor entered into a contract with the contractor to execute the suspended remaining part of the construction work, and the contractor actually did not receive the construction cost while performing the construction work.

On the other hand, around February 18, 2014, as the above F selected D as a contractor to take charge of the construction of an officetel solely without the consent of the financial institution that granted the above loan related to the construction of an officetel, D cannot be deemed as a legitimate contractor, and D cannot be deemed as a lien for the commencement of possession of the above officetel in a tort method. Furthermore, upon the judgment of the court below, the Korea Asset Trust Co., Ltd. registered as the owner of the above officetel under the real estate management trust agreement entered into with F with F was delegated to G law firm on March 19, 2015 with the right of possession and management of the above officetel, and the defendant continuously delegated the above officetel a lien for the above officetel.

I asserted that the crime was committed as follows.

1. On November 21, 2016, the Defendant damaged property and infringed on a structure: (a) around 18:00, the Defendant opened a gate locking device installed in the Victim G by the victim law firm G to open and open the gate locking machine; (b) caused the damage of the market price by letting the gate locked locking device installed in the victim law firm G installed in the victim law firm G installed; and (c) continuously intruded the structure managed by the said victim into the above 704 entrance.

2. At the above time and place, the Defendant shall prevent H and I, a D employee, from entering the law firm G employee of 909 of an officetel.

“To make the word “H and I” means H and I.