Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

After the owner of Etel in Busan-gun-gun, 2012, Busan-gun, the owner of the Etel was not completed the building and the defendant had claimed the right of retention for the above officetel on the ground that he was not paid the construction cost from the owner, and the complainant in this case had been asked to leave the office for several years on the ground that the owner was delegated with the right of management of the building by the owner.

On June 26, 2006, the Defendant reported the lien to five households from 301 to 305 of the above officetels with respect to the auction case of Busan District Court's Dong Branch G G auction case, and the above auction was completed on November 28, 2006.

Since then, the Defendant could not use or benefit from the method of leasing the goods kept in custody or act as an agent on the basis of the lien. However, the Defendant, including the above five households, for whom the first five households claimed the lien, had the intention to rent the said officetels to a third party and gain profit therefrom.

On October 14, 2008, the Defendant removed the entrance correction device of the 202 door door of the Etel owned by the victim H in Busan-gun, Busan-gun, in an irregular manner.

On November 15, 2008, the Defendant: (a) installed the entrance correction device under subparagraph 403 of the said officetel; (b) installed the entrance correction device under subparagraph 801 of the said officetel on October 17, 2008; (c) installed the entrance correction device under subparagraph 701 of the said officetel on December 2, 2008; and (d) installed the entrance correction device under subparagraph 404 of the said officetel on April 1, 2009, thereby damaging property owned by others on the market price.

"2013 Highly 190"

1. On November 15, 2008, the Defendant: (a) removed the entrance correction device of the 403 gate of the instant officetel owned by the victim H in Busan-gun, Busan-gun; and (b) entered the place and intrudes on another’s structure.

2. The Defendant is the victim by removing an entrance correction device of the above officetel 301 on February 2, 2009, which was removed in an irregular manner on February 2, 2009.