A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the lessor of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 2301, and C is the lessee of the said officetel, and the victim D is the children of the said officetel, who reside in the said officetel.

1. On January 30, 2015, the Defendant entered the instant officetel around 7:40 p.m., the Defendant: (a) had the victim not paid monthly rent for four months; (b) opened the entrance door using Maskyki and entered the said officetel into the said officetel; and (c) had the victim invaded on the residence of the victim.

2. The Defendant, as stated in paragraph (1), entered the said officetel at the time and place described in paragraph (1), and publicly insultd the victim by stating that “The victim was unaware of the victim’s ship E, i.e., whether the victim was able to salute, salute, and as soon as possible,” while the victim’s ship E.

3. The Defendant interfered with business, as described in paragraph (1), entered the instant officetel at the time, place, and place described in paragraph (1), and obstructed the victim’s investment consultation service for about twenty minutes by force by opening a sexual harassment to the victim, stating that “I am Ga, Ga, Ga, Ga, Ga, Ga, Ga, Ga, Ga, Ga, Ga.”

4. Obstruction.

A. From January 31, 2015 to December 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim to leave the said officetel from the said officetel to the said officetel; and (b) prevented the victim from exercising his/her rights by arbitrarily using the said officetel by arbitrarily changing its passwords, thereby undermining its utility; and (c) preventing the victim from exercising his/her rights by using the said officetel owned by the Defendant, which was the object of the victim’s possession.

B. On February 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) removed a lock lock device of an intermediate entrance that ought to be used in order to enter the said officetel; and (b) placed the said officetel owned by the Defendant, which became the object of the victim’s possession, thereby impairing its utility by installing an indoor lock.