logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.05.16 2017고정269
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who serves as a person in charge of bond sales in the “C” located in the Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B underground 101.

No one shall make a false indication of origin or make an indication likely to cause confusion as to the raw materials of agricultural and fishery products or agricultural and fishery products.

Nevertheless, on March 29, 2016, the Defendant purchased 2 kg (200g 10 g) from China to 16,500 won per kg (33,000 won per purchase price) in Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and sold 0.2 g (1 g (1 g) to a special consumer visiting 19,750 won per kg, indicating the origin at home and selling it to 16,50 won from March 30, 2016 to 30, and selling it to 19,750 won, indicating the origin in the above way, with the intention of selling it to 1.8 g (35,50 won) from Korea to 30, March 30, 2016 to 1.5 g (35,50 won) from Korea to k in the above way.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Evidence photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (specific quantity purchased at the risk of China);

1. Relevant Article 14 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (1) 1 of the Act on the Selection of Origin of Agricultural and Fishery Products (excluding punishment) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Provisional Payment Order is that the Defendant committed the instant crime while serving as an employee in charge of meat in the Marart’s judgment; the Defendant’s sale at two risks in order to display and sell the instant case is about 40,000 won; and the Defendant took the attitude of recognizing and opposing the Defendant’s mistake; and the Defendant has no criminal history, the sentence is determined as per Disposition in consideration of the fact that the Defendant has no criminal history.

arrow