logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.11.20 2018고단948
무고
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, and by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendants were dismissed, and C was subject to suspension from office, for the following reasons: (a) the Defendants worked together in the E plant located in C and Haan-gun, Haan-gun; and (b) the Defendants were dismissed from office in the above plant.

1. Defendant A, who was not dismissed, was believed to be due to the fact that C informed of himself, etc. related to the above case, and was subject to forced indecent conduct by C by falsity.

After filing a complaint, it was difficult to prepare a plan to demand reinstatement to the company by pressureing C, which is the chief of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment.

On April 26, 2018, the Defendant prepared a civil petition office of the competent police station in the Haan-gun, Haan-gun, the Haan-gun, the Haan-dong, the Haan-gun, the 85 Sinan-dong on April 26, 2018, to the effect that “A’s sexual organ is confined to A’s sexual organ damage from the E factory analysis office around January 4, 2018, and the competent Minister, ② around 16:00 on February 21, 2018, the Defendant sent the A’s sexual organ to the above factory packing room, and ③ around 17:30 on February 27, 2018, the Defendant prepared a letter to the effect that “A’s her sexual organ around the above factory guard room and caused indecent act, such as coercion, by force, committed an indecent act,” and submitted the above letter to the police officer in charge of the complaint.

However, the defendant did not have been forced to commit an indecent act by C as above.

As a result, the defendant brought a false accusation against C for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment.

2. Defendant B, upon receiving the above information from the Co-Defendant A to the effect that he was dismissed from office, and C was about suspension from office, and the Co-Defendant A was aware of his intention to make a false statement as an witness at the police station, upon receiving a request from the Co-Defendant A to the effect that “A was followed while he was going to get off the check in front of the guard room and sprinking A’s sexual organ.”

On April 30, 2018, the Defendant is in charge of the daily traffic safety at the police station inside the police station on April 20, 2018.

arrow